For now we’re sharing Giulia Forsythe’s illustration of the process the students and we went through in transforming publicly available page scans of four 18th-century books on abolition into machine-readable texts. In the process students learned how to read texts slowly using conventional “slow” reading and new forms of text mining using Voyant Tools.
Putting together a course like ours poses many challenges, but for online teaching newbies like us the most daunting has been learning to design courses effectively for a new medium. The experience has taken us out of our comfort zone. Neither of us were Luddites – indeed, we liked to think of ourselves as being on top of some technologies. But it’s not technology per se that seems to be the issue for us; it’s the array of tools one must learn. There are so many things we need to learn, so many tools to figure out, and in a relatively short period of time. Never mind course design; never mind best practices in online forums; never mind making (and editing!) videos; never mind appropriate visual layouts; and for that matter never mind tools and applications like Scripto and TimelineJS. None of these are minor; indeed, they all warrant some discussion here. But the truly daunting challenges are coming now with our planned digital transcription assignment. Continue reading →
Fun fact: Before about 1800, “s” and “f” looked VERY similar in printed texts but they were clearly distinct letters (sort of like “1”, “l” and “I”, or “O” and “0” today). Here’s an example: In an 18th-century essay Joseph Warton wrote that “the favorite and peculiar pasttime” of Ariel in Shakespeare’s The Tempest is expressed in the following song:
This passage is an example of the kind of text that has given us course-planning fits in the past week. Imagine what a blind student using assistive reading technology would hear when trying to listen to this passage! We don’t have to imagine what the OCR (optical character recognition) technology used by archive.org does with the passage, because this is what you will actually (no joke) find online at archive.org (WARNING: explicit language):
Preparing to teach online has encouraged us to make fuller use of the online world by utilizing the dynamic, interactive tools of digital humanities scholarship. For some time, digital humanities have come to be seen as something of a panacea. And now, the rise of “Big History”, which embraces “big data” and DH tools, seems poised to push the discipline in that direction. Neither of us has ever shared that view, but we have both been adapting gradually to the new possibilities offered by computer tools in research and teaching. Over the years, both of us have developed databases working with census materials and vital statistics, experimented with alternatives to PowerPoint such as Prezi, taught with online research tools, and organized much of our own research with Zotero. More recently though we have begun to explore the potential of tools for text analysis, something that pushes us more fully into the world of Digital History. We hope the course we’re developing will encourage students to engage more fully with the possibilities of research in a digital world, while also giving us an opportunity to share the learning experience with them. Continue reading →
Last spring, we (Danny Samson and Mike Driedger) began the design of a new online history course for Brock University. The basic idea was to create a wholly online course that combined our specialisations in colonial North America (Danny) and early modern Europe (Mike). Thus, we have a second-year course called “Money and Power in the Atlantic World, 1400-1830”; it will be delivered for the first time in fall-winter 2015-16. The reasons for the development of the course will be the subject of a later post, but for now we’ll emphasise a desire to try to some new things, to engage some new students, and try our hand at teaching with digital tools. Continue reading →